Expanding to Amazon Europe means five main marketplaces, three fulfilment models, VAT registration in every country you hold stock in, and an advertising auction that is usually cheaper than the UK. Here is the order to do it in.
Strategy
Amazon Europe is five main marketplaces, Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, sharing one seller account and one advertising console. The advertising auction is usually cheaper than the UK, which is the commercial reason to go. The reasons brands stall are almost never advertising: they are translation, VAT and fulfilment, decided in the wrong order.
We manage advertising across 16 marketplaces, and the European ones behave differently enough from the UK that copying a UK account across rarely works. This is the order we take brands through it, what each stage costs in time rather than just money, and where the auction is genuinely softer.
One caveat up front, because it matters. Tax and product compliance rules change, and getting them wrong is expensive in a way that a poor advertising decision is not. Everything below is the practical shape of the problem, not tax advice. Use an accountant who works with marketplace sellers.
What is on this page
Why Amazon Europe is worth the paperwork
The argument is straightforward: the same product, the same photography and largely the same strategy, competing against fewer advertisers. In several European categories the number of serious bidders is a fraction of the UK equivalent, and in Italy and Spain particularly, click prices reflect that.
There is a second, quieter benefit. A brand selling across five marketplaces is far less exposed to one country’s seasonality, one competitor’s price war or one account issue. Diversification inside Amazon is cheaper to build than diversification onto other platforms, though both are worth having, which is the case we made in Beyond Amazon.
The cost is administrative rather than commercial. There is no clever way around VAT registrations, product compliance and native language listings. What you can control is the order you take them on, so that you are not paying for compliance in five countries before you know whether one of them sells.
Which marketplace to open first
For most categories the answer is Germany. It is the largest European marketplace by a clear margin, shoppers are comfortable with higher price points in many categories, and the translation and compliance work you do there is the template for everything after it.
France usually comes next, with the caveat that French listing requirements and consumer expectations are stricter than most sellers anticipate, particularly around product information and returns. Italy and Spain are smaller but have noticeably thinner advertising auctions, which makes them attractive for brands with good margins who want cheaper clicks while they learn. The Netherlands is smaller again and underserved in a lot of categories, which occasionally makes it a quiet winner.
Two things should override the size ranking. If your product has a regulatory or cultural fit somewhere specific, follow that. And if your category is already crowded in Germany with established local brands, a smaller marketplace where you can actually rank is worth more than a bigger one where you cannot.
Test before you commit. You can list into a European marketplace on the European Fulfilment Network without any new stock movement, run a modest advertising budget, and see whether demand exists. That test costs a few hundred pounds and a fortnight. Committing to Pan EU registrations first, then discovering the demand is not there, costs considerably more.
Thinking about Europe and not sure where to start?
Send us your account and category. We will tell you which marketplace we would open first, and why.
EFN or Pan EU FBA, and why order matters
This is the decision that drives everything else, including your tax obligations.
With the European Fulfilment Network, your stock sits in one country and Amazon ships it across borders when an order comes in from another. You get one storage location, one set of inventory to manage, and typically one VAT registration to worry about at the start. You pay a cross border fee per unit and delivery is slower, which affects both conversion and the Prime badge in some markets.
With Pan EU FBA, Amazon distributes your stock across several countries and fulfils locally. Fees per unit drop, delivery speeds up, and the Prime experience is stronger. The price is that you now hold stock in multiple countries, which triggers VAT registration in each of them.
The sensible sequence is almost always EFN first, Pan EU later. Start simple, prove there is demand, then let the arithmetic tell you when to switch: when the cross border fees you are paying exceed the cost of the extra registrations and accounting, the case makes itself. Brands that go straight to Pan EU because it is cheaper per unit often spend a year paying for compliance in countries that never produced meaningful volume.
VAT and compliance, in plain terms
Three ideas cover most of it. Holding stock in a country generally means registering for VAT there. That is the rule that makes Pan EU expensive to administer. Selling across borders from stock held in one place can often be handled through the One Stop Shop scheme, which is designed to avoid multiple registrations. And product compliance is separate from tax, with many categories requiring a responsible person established in the EU, along with labelling and documentation requirements that have tightened in recent years.
The practical failure mode is not usually getting a rule wrong. It is discovering a rule late, after stock has shipped, and having listings blocked while inventory sits in a warehouse accruing storage fees. Before any stock moves, get three answers in writing from somebody qualified: which registrations you need for your chosen model, what compliance your specific category requires, and who your responsible person will be.
Budget for this properly. Registrations, filings and an accountant who understands marketplaces are an ongoing cost, not a one off, and they should be in the margin calculation before you decide whether Europe is worth it. A product that works at a UK margin can be marginal in Europe once compliance is counted, and it is far better to discover that on a spreadsheet.
Translation is a research job, not a language job
The most expensive mistake in European expansion is treating listings as a translation task. Run your English title through a translation tool and you get grammatically correct text built around the keywords English speakers use, which is not what German or Italian shoppers type.
What you actually need is native language keyword research done from scratch: what do people in that country call this product, what problem do they describe when they search for it, which words carry the volume. Then a listing written around those terms by somebody fluent, rather than translated from yours. The difference shows up in both rank and conversion, and it is the reason two brands with identical products can have completely different outcomes in the same marketplace.
The same applies to images and A plus content. Text in images needs localising, size and measurement conventions differ, and compliance claims that are fine in one country can be problematic in another. The principles that make a listing convert do not change across borders, and they are the ones in your listing is a mobile listing now, but the words do.
A translated listing tells a German shopper what an English shopper wanted to know. That is not the same product page, even though every word is correct.
How the advertising auction differs
Mechanically, European advertising is identical to the UK: same campaign types, same match types, same bid strategies. Commercially, three things differ enough to change how you run it.
The auction is usually thinner. Fewer serious advertisers compete, particularly in Italy and Spain, so the same bid buys more visibility. This is the main financial argument for expanding and it is real, though it narrows every year as more brands arrive.
Keyword volumes are lower. Campaigns take longer to gather statistically useful data, so the patience required in a launch is greater, not smaller. Judging a German campaign on two weeks of data is even less reliable than judging a UK one.
Automatic campaigns matter more. Because your keyword instincts are worse in a language you do not speak, discovery campaigns do more of the work early on. Run them, read the search term report carefully, and let the market tell you what it calls your product. That process is exactly the one in the search term report guide, and in a new country it is the primary research tool rather than a tidying exercise.
Treat each new marketplace as a product launch rather than an extension of an existing account. Rank starts at zero, reviews often start at zero, and the phases are the same ones set out in the first 90 days. Copying UK bids into a German campaign on day one produces the worst of both: bids calibrated for a different auction against a listing with no history.
Running Europe from a UK account and suspecting it is not working properly?
Twenty minutes on a call, and we will tell you what we would change first.
The sequence that works
One. Pick one marketplace, usually Germany, and check your category is not already dominated by entrenched local brands.
Two. Get compliance answers in writing before stock moves: registrations, category requirements, responsible person.
Three. Build proper native language listings for a small number of your best products rather than your whole catalogue. Three good listings beat thirty translated ones.
Four. List on EFN so no new stock movement is needed, and run a modest advertising budget with automatic campaigns doing the discovery.
Five. Give it a fair test, which in a lower volume marketplace means longer than you would allow at home. Read the search terms, fix the listings around what you learn.
Six. Once volume justifies it, do the Pan EU arithmetic and switch if the fees say so. Then repeat the whole sequence in the next country, with the advantage that you have already done it once.
Five ways European expansion goes wrong
Launching all five marketplaces at once. Five times the compliance, five times the listings, and no attention on any of them.
Machine translated listings. Correct words, wrong keywords, poor conversion, higher returns.
Going straight to Pan EU. Paying for registrations in countries that have not yet proven they sell anything.
Copying UK bids across. A different auction with different volumes deserves its own calibration.
Judging too early. Lower search volume means slower data. Six weeks in Germany is not the same test as six weeks in the UK, and calling it early is how brands abandon a market that was about to work.
Send us the reports and we will tell you if Europe is worth it for your catalogue
Written answer in three working days. Free, no card, and yours to keep either way.
Frequently asked questions
Germany for most categories, because it is the largest European marketplace by some distance and translation costs are the same whichever country you pick. France and Italy usually follow. The exception is when your product has an obvious cultural or regulatory fit elsewhere, in which case follow the demand rather than the size ranking.
You need a VAT registration in any country where you hold stock, which is why Pan EU FBA multiplies your obligations. Distance selling from one country can often be handled through the One Stop Shop scheme instead. The rules change, and getting this wrong is expensive, so take advice from an accountant who handles marketplace sellers rather than relying on a blog post.
With the European Fulfilment Network your stock sits in one country and Amazon ships it across borders, which keeps compliance simple but adds a cross border fee and longer delivery times. With Pan EU FBA Amazon distributes your stock across several countries, which cuts fees and speeds delivery but requires VAT registration in each storage country.
In most categories yes, particularly in Italy and Spain where the auction is thinner. That is the main commercial argument for expanding: the same product and the same creative competing against fewer bidders. Germany is closer to UK pricing and in some categories more competitive.
Technically you can, and it is the most common expensive mistake in European expansion. Machine translated or English listings convert badly, rank badly because your keywords are wrong, and generate returns from confused buyers. Native language keyword research is not a translation job, it is a research job.
For many product categories yes. EU rules require a responsible person established in the EU for a wide range of goods, and product safety regulations have tightened. Check the requirements for your specific category before shipping stock rather than after a listing gets blocked.
Plan for six to nine months to reach meaningful volume in a new marketplace, assuming translated listings and a proper advertising launch. It behaves like a product launch rather than a switch being flipped, because you are building rank from zero in a market where nobody knows the brand.
It depends on margin and logistics rather than on market size. The United States is one language, one tax approach and enormous volume, but fierce competition. Europe is several languages and several tax registrations, but thinner advertising auctions. Brands with strong margins and simple products often do better in Europe than they expect.
Send the right reports. Get a straight answer back.
We read the account properly and write back with where the money is going, what it is buying, and the three things we would change first. You keep it either way.
No obligation · no card · a person replies, usually the same working day