Sponsored Products does the selling. Sponsored Brands takes the top of the page and protects it. Sponsored Display follows shoppers around and defends your listings. Here is what each one is actually for, and the order to switch them on.
Amazon PPC
Sponsored Products does the selling. Sponsored Brands takes the top of the results page and holds it. Sponsored Display follows shoppers who viewed and left, and defends your own product pages from competitors. They are layers rather than alternatives, and switching on the second before the first is finished is the most common way budgets get spread thin.
Most accounts we take over are running all three, none of them properly. This is what each one is actually for, when it earns its budget, and the order that works.
What is on this page
Three formats, three jobs
The distinction that matters is what triggers the ad. Sponsored Products and Sponsored Brands are triggered by a search, so they intercept demand that already exists. Sponsored Display is triggered by who somebody is and what they have looked at, so it reaches people who are not searching at that moment.
That difference decides everything else: how fast each one pays back, how you measure it, and what a sensible target looks like. If the underlying auction mechanics are new to you, start with Amazon PPC explained.
What Sponsored Brands actually buys
Sponsored Brands puts your logo, a headline and up to three products across the top of the results page, above everything else. It is the most valuable piece of real estate in the store, and it does two jobs at once.
It occupies space. A shopper searching your category sees your brand before they see any listing. That matters even when they do not click, because the next time they search you are familiar.
It defends your name. On your own brand terms, holding that placement stops a competitor buying a shopper who typed your name into the box.
Three formats sit inside it. The product collection sends traffic to a set of your products or your Store. The Store spotlight pushes people into your Brand Store, which is worth using if the Store is genuinely good and worth avoiding if it is not. And video, which often outperforms the others when the video shows the product being used in the first three seconds rather than opening with a logo animation.
Headline copy does most of the work. You get one line above the most valuable placement on the page. Use it to answer the objection that stops the sale, not to state the category. “Fits every 32mm pipe, no tools needed” beats “Premium quality plumbing supplies” every time, and it costs nothing to change.
What Sponsored Display actually buys
Sponsored Display targets audiences and product pages rather than searches, which gives it three genuinely different uses.
Retargeting your own viewers. People who looked at your product and did not buy. The cheapest and most reliable of the three, and the right place to start.
Defending your own listings. Placing your own ads on your own product pages so the carousel below your buy button is not entirely made of competitors.
Targeting competitor listings. Putting your product on their page. It works when your offer is clearly better on a dimension the shopper can see at a glance, and it wastes money when it is not.
Some campaign types reach beyond Amazon onto third party sites and apps, still targeted with Amazon shopping behaviour. That makes Sponsored Display a lighter version of what Amazon DSP does, without the seat or the media commitment, which is why it is often the sensible step before DSP rather than instead of it.
Running all three and not sure which is actually working?
Send us the reports. We will show you what each format is really contributing, free.
The order to switch them on
Step one is the one people skip past. Sponsored Products fully worked means the search term report has been mined, the waste is cut, winners have been harvested into exact match, and placements are set from your own data. Until that is true, every pound spent on the other formats is buying harder demand while easier demand sits uncaptured. The routine for it is in the search term report guide.
Steps two and three are cheap and defensive, which is why they come next. Steps four and five are prospecting, they cost more per sale, and they deserve a proper measurement conversation before you start rather than after.
Bidding on your own name
Sellers hate this one. Why pay for a shopper who already typed your brand?
Because if you do not hold that placement, somebody else will, and they will be buying a customer you earned. The cost of defending is usually small, since your relevance on your own name is high and your conversion rate on that traffic is excellent.
Two rules keep it honest. Use fixed bids rather than dynamic, because you do not want an algorithm deciding to spend more when somebody searches your own name. And watch the share of total brand searches you are paying for: if it climbs while total brand sales stay flat, you have moved from defending to subsidising, and the trade off is the same one covered in ACOS vs TACOS.
Defending your brand name is insurance. It is worth paying for and it should never be one of your larger line items.
How much budget each layer deserves
There is no universal split, but there is a shape that works and a shape that does not.
The shape that works keeps Sponsored Products carrying the clear majority of spend, because it is the format converting existing demand at the lowest cost. Sponsored Brands takes a meaningful minority, weighted towards defence early and prospecting later. Sponsored Display stays small until retargeting has proved itself, then grows only if new to brand share justifies it.
The shape that does not work is an even split. Three formats at a third each looks balanced and means none of them has enough volume to learn from, so every report is noise and every decision is a guess.
One practical rule. Before moving budget into Brands or Display, check whether your Sponsored Products campaigns are hitting their daily caps. A campaign spending out by lunchtime is rationed, and adding budget there almost always returns more than opening a new format. The wider argument about where money quietly goes is in cutting ACOS without losing rank.
How to judge each one
| Format | Judge it on | Not on |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsored Products | ACOS against break even | Impressions |
| Sponsored Brands, brand terms | Share of brand searches held, cost of holding | Return alone, it will always look great |
| Sponsored Brands, category terms | New to brand share and ACOS together | ACOS alone |
| Sponsored Display, retargeting | Return, and frequency | Reach |
| Sponsored Display, competitor | New to brand share | Impressions or clicks |
New to brand appears twice in that table for a reason. Both prospecting formats exist to reach people who do not know you, and the metric that says whether they did is the one covered in new to brand.
When not to run them at all
Being direct, since both formats get sold hard.
If you are not brand registered, Sponsored Brands is unavailable and getting registered is worth more than any campaign you could build instead.
If your listings do not convert, both formats send colder traffic than Sponsored Products, so a page that struggles with warm shoppers will struggle harder here. Fix the page first.
If your budget is small, splitting a few thousand a month across three formats gives none of them enough data to optimise. Concentrate until the volume justifies spreading.
If nobody will read the reports, Display in particular drifts. It is the format most likely to keep spending quietly on audiences that stopped working two months ago.
Five ways money leaks here
Running all three before Sponsored Products is finished. Buying the hard demand while the easy demand is still unclaimed.
Sending Sponsored Brands traffic to a weak Store. The Store spotlight format is only as good as the Store behind it. If nobody has updated it in a year, send traffic to a product collection instead.
Letting retargeting eat the Display budget. It performs best on a short window report, so budget drifts towards it, and prospecting quietly stops happening.
No frequency control. The twentieth impression to the same shopper buys nothing the fourth one did not.
Competitor targeting with a weaker offer. If your price, reviews and images do not beat theirs at a glance, you are paying to advertise their listing.
Run in the right order, these two formats do genuinely useful work: one occupies the most valuable space on the page, the other picks up the shoppers who nearly bought. Run in the wrong order, they are an expensive way to look busy while the easy money sits untouched one level below.
Want the three formats set up in the right order?
Twenty minutes on a call and we will tell you which layer your account is actually ready for.
Send us the reports and we will read all three formats together
Free, no card, written answer in three working days, and yours to keep either way.
Frequently asked questions
Sponsored Brands is a search placement: your logo, a headline and several products across the top of the results page, triggered by keywords. Sponsored Display is an audience placement: it follows shoppers who viewed your product or a competitor’s around Amazon and beyond, and it is not triggered by a search at all.
For Sponsored Brands, yes. Sponsored Display is available to brand registered sellers and, for some campaign types, to vendors as well. If you are not brand registered, getting registered is worth more than any campaign you could build without it.
Neither, until Sponsored Products is fully worked. Once it is, start with Sponsored Brands on your own brand terms to defend the top of the page, then Sponsored Display retargeting your own product viewers. Those two are the cheapest wins in both formats.
Usually yes, though it feels wrong. If you do not hold that placement a competitor will, and they are buying a shopper who typed your name. Keep the bids controlled and fixed rather than dynamic, and watch how much of the spend is going to people who would have found you anyway.
Brand defence campaigns typically run well below your account average, often in single figures, because the intent is very high. Prospecting Sponsored Brands campaigns on category terms run higher and should be judged partly on new to brand share rather than on the ratio alone.
Some campaign types extend beyond Amazon to third party sites and apps, using Amazon’s shopping signals to decide who sees them. It is a lighter version of what Amazon DSP does, without the seat or the media commitment.
If you have a video that shows the product being used in the first three seconds, yes. Video placements often convert well because they answer the size and use questions a static image cannot. A poor video is worse than none, so do not force it.
Send the right reports. Get a straight answer back.
We read the account properly and write back with where the money is going, what it is buying, and the three things we would change first. You keep it either way.
No obligation · no card · a person replies, usually the same working day